Take 2: Hub Arkush and Tom Musick debate the Bears' 2-0 start

H. Rick Bamman - hbamman@shawmedia.com Chicago's Jay Cutler signals to the bench during the NFL game between the Minnesota Vikings and the Bears Sunday, Sept. 15, 2013. (H. Rick Bamman)

The Bears improved to 2-0 this week with a last-minute win against the Minnesota Vikings. Hub Arkush and Tom Musick discuss:

Musick: Hub, I have been busy crunching some numbers. By my calculations, the Bears will finish 16-0. Matt Forte will catch 120 passes. Martellus Bennett will score 24 touchdowns. And – this statistic might be the craziest of all – Jay Cutler will be sacked eight times. Not a bad season, huh?

Arkush: Yessir, Mr. Musick. I suspect they'd take it. But you forget, using your metrics, Jay Cutler will throw 24 Interceptions and have eight fumbles returned for touchdowns, Julius Peppers will have eight tackles all season, no sacks and nay a QB hurry. In fact, the entire D-line will notch just 16 sacks, which will approach an NFL record for futility in the pass rush and the Bears will have only three wide receivers and one tight end catch passes all season long. I hate being the glass half empty guy.

Musick: Aww, man, you totally rained on my parade. It was going to be a great parade, too. I had my lawn chair set up and everything. But now I feel kind of goofy proclaiming that Devin Hester should be the comeback player of the year or that Tony Fiammetta should be the anonymous fullback of the year. I feel depressed, almost as if I drove all the way down the field, only to throw an interception in the end zone.

Arkush: Gee Tom, now that you mention it, Cutler threw one of those - drove them down the field before throwing the pinball pick to Kevin Williams - against the Vikes too, so maybe we get eight of those this year? But c'mon man, you know I'm just funnin' with you. There's no way our final image of the 2013 Chicago Bears will be anywhere near as record-setting, over-the-top great as you paint it, or as stinky as my picture sounds. The real bottom line here is what have we seen so far we can trust, and what might just be beginners' luck?

Musick: Is beginners' luck related to Andrew Luck? Are they cousins or something? Anyway, I really do think that luck (not Andrew, the other one) has a lot to do with the Bears' 2-0 start. I mean, if the Cincinnati Bengals had any sort of discipline, they beat the Bears in Week 1. And if the Vikings play better defense for 10 more seconds, they beat the Bears in Week 2. Next up on the Bears' schedule is the winless, injury-riddled Pittsburgh Steelers, who just so happen to look like a mediocre middle school team. Sounds like luck is going to stick around.

Arkush: Yeah, I don't know. I'll give you luck - beginners, not Andrew - against the Bengals, although the Bears still had to make the plays to win. But I'd argue they had as much bad luck as good against the Vikings. After all, if they don't give Minnesota a 105-yard kickoff return touchdown and a 61-yard fumble return TD, they win that one going away. I do think we can start to form some conclusions after this Sunday night, though. After what we've seen of the Steelers so far, if the Bears are a good football team, they need to win this one handily. I'd love to find out the glass is half full. But if they struggle at the big Ketchup bottle in Pitt, we may have to rethink this whole thing.

Musick: First road trip of the season. Let’s see if the Bears can cut the mustard.

Previous Page|1|2|Next Page

Sign up for text messages on your mobile phone or PDA with news from the Chicago Bears from ChicagoFootball.com.

Popular Headlines

Reader poll

1/4 of the way through the regular season, are you more or less confident about the Bears making the playoffs?
More confident
Less confident
Unchanged